I've handled a few hundred Social Security disability hearings, and all of them are different and the same. Each person has their own unique story, but there are common threads that are woven throughout the tapestry of a good case.
Second, if subjective
complaints and objective evidence (medical records) line up, then a claimant is
usually deemed "credible." This means the claimant is
believable. Veracity is one part of it, but it is more about the
complaints, the evidence, and the actual symptoms being in sync.
Third, the "little
things" (anecdotes) line up with the evidence and claimant's story. For example, if a claimant sits on a bench in the shower and can't bend
over to tie his or her shoes, then that claimant cannot meet the demands of a job
where they need to stand. If the only jobs that person can do require
standing, then that claimant is likely disabled.
There are no silver bullets in
disability cases, but I continue to be amazed at how cases are made or lost on
seemingly "little things" that end up looming large because they are
reliable indicia.
No comments:
Post a Comment